Comparing spatiotemporal gait parameters between overground walking and self-paced treadmill walking in persons after stroke.

Since self-paced treadmills enable more natural gait patterns compared to fixed-speed treadmills we examined the use of a self-paced treadmill as a alternative for overground gait analysis in persons after stroke. Twenty-five persons after stroke (10 males/15 females; 53 ± 12.05 years; 40.72 ± 42.94 months post-stroke) walked at self-selected speed overground (GAITRite, CIR Systems) and on a self-paced treadmill (GRAIL, Motek) in randomized order. Spatiotemporal parameters, variability and symmetry measures were compared using paired-sample t-tests or Wilcoxon Signed Rank tests. Concurrent validity was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman plots. A regression model determined the contribution of the walking velocity to the changes in spatiotemporal parameters. The velocity on the treadmill was significant lower compared to overground (p < 0.001). This difference predicted the significant changes in other spatiotemporal parameters to varying degrees (27.7%–83.8%). Bland-Altman plots showed large percentage of bias and limits of agreement. Variability and symmetry measures were similar between conditions. When considering gait analysis in persons after stroke a self-paced treadmill may be a valuable alternative for overground analysis. Although a slower walking velocity, and accompanying changes in other spatiotemporal parameters, should be taken into account compared to overground walking. Considering the advantages regarding space and time, instrumented treadmills provide opportunities for gait assessment and training in a stroke population. When using self-paced treadmills for clinical gait analysis in persons after stroke, the slower walking velocity and accompanying changes in other spatiotemporal parameters need to be taken into account. Stroke patients seem to preserve their walking pattern on a self-paced treadmill. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]