Comparison of tree-growth drought legacies of three shelterbelt species in the Canadian Prairies.

• Drought response of three disparate shelterbelt species is explored. • Severe and extreme 3-month droughts most greatly affect tree. • Scots pine and white spruce recover more quickly than green ash. Across western Canada, more frequent and severe droughts are expected to occur as a result of climate change. Forests are particularly vulnerable to drought as it often results in mortality events even years following a moisture deficit. Similar events have been observed in Saskatchewan shelterbelts, where many species are planted far outside their native range and are likely more vulnerable to environmental changes. Understanding how common shelterbelt species respond to drought will help landowners make better management decisions under a changing climate. This study looks at how three common shelterbelt species (green ash, Scots pine and white spruce) respond to different drought characteristics (severity, timing, and length) for up to five years following a moisture deficit using superposed epoch analysis. We identified that severe and extreme 3-month droughts greatly impact all three species. However, Scots pine and white spruce tend to recover more rapidly than green ash. Green ash is typically considered one of the most drought tolerant shelterbelt species, but its long recovery times suggest that this may be false. Scots pine was impacted by late summer droughts and white spruce was impacted by June droughts. Both Scots pine and white spruce also saw compensatory growth after their recovery period. This research augments our understanding of how drought characteristics impact three common shelterbelt species in Saskatchewan and how they are likely to recover under more frequent and severe drought events given projected climate change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]