Back to Search Start Over

Intracardiac echocardiography is a safe and effective alternative to transesophageal echocardiography for left atrial appendage thrombus evaluation at the time of atrial fibrillation ablation: The ICE‐TEE study.

Authors :
Wang, Yuxing
Zhao, Yi
Zhou, Kuangshi
Zei, Paul C.
Wang, Yunhe
Cheng, Hui
Chen, Shiquan
Tao, Yuhang
Mao, Yankai
Liu, Qiang
Bangash, Abdul Basit
Sheng, Xia
Sun, Yaxun
Zhang, Pei
Yu, Lu
Lin, Jianwei
Zhang, Zuwen
Fu, Guosheng
Jiang, Ruhong
Jiang, Chenyang
Source :
Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology. Jan2023, Vol. 46 Issue 1, p3-10. 8p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) technology has been increasingly accepted as an integral part of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedures. It is still unknown whether ICE can routinely replace transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for routine thrombus screening in non‐selective AF patients. Objective: To assess whether ICE can routinely replace TEE in screening for left atrial (LA)/left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in general patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. Methods: A total of 2003 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation were included. 1155 patients (ICE group) received intra‐procedural ICE examination for LA/LAA thrombus screening, while 848 patients (TEE group) received pre‐procedure TEE examination. The incidence of thrombus, peri‐procedure complications, and hospital efficiency were assessed. Results: The LA and LAA were adequately visualized in all patients. Five patients in the ICE group and 15 patients in the TEE group were found to have LAA thrombus. The incidence of major periprocedural thrombo‐embolic events was comparable between two groups (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p =.76), none were due to undetected LA/LAA thrombus. Other major periprocedural complications occurred at similar rates in both groups, while post‐procedure fever was less common in the ICE group (12.7% vs. 17.4%, p <.001). Procedure times and hospital length of stay were both shorter in the ICE group (142 min [87–197 min] vs. 150 min [95–205 min], and 3[2–4] day vs. 4[3–5] day, respectively, both p <.001). Conclusions: ICE can replace TEE for atrial thrombus screening in AF patients undergoing ablation without increased complications. An "ICE replacing TEE" workflow can also reduce the incidence of postoperative fever and improve hospital efficiency. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01478389
Volume :
46
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Pacing & Clinical Electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
161228728
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14601