Back to Search Start Over

Cytotoxicity and cell injuries of flavored electronic cigarette aerosol and mainstream cigarette smoke: A comprehensive in vitro evaluation.

Authors :
Wang, Lilan
Wang, Yao
Yang, Xuemin
Duan, Kun
Jiang, Xingtao
Chen, Jianwen
Liu, Peiqing
Li, Min
Source :
Toxicology Letters. Feb2023, Vol. 374, p96-110. 15p.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Although electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have attracted much attention due to their claimed harm-reduction effects compared with conventional cigarettes, the adverse effects of e-cigarette aerosol exposure on human health are still unclear. In this work we compared the cytotoxic effects of combustion cigarettes with four commercially available flavored electronic cigarettes and their main components on ten cell lines. Cell injury mechanism of e-cigarette aerosol and combustible cigarette smoke was also explored using cellular models. Eleven kinds of e-cigarettes aerosol condensates (ECSCs) and cigarette smoke constituent's condensates (CSC) were collected by Cambridge filter pad, and the nicotine contents were determined by UPLC to provide an equivalent nicotine dosage. The CCK-8 assay was used to measure the cell viability differences between ECSC and CSC. Based on RNA-seq results, we compared the effects of ECSC and CSC on various cell injury pathways. Oxidative stress and inflammatory responses were further tested by Western Blot, immunofluorescence, and qRT-PCR assays. CSC was found to be more cytotoxic than flavored ECSC and their main components, and BEAS-2B cell line was the most sensitive cells by comparing the IC50 value. With prolonged exposure duration and higher doses, ECSC began to exhibit cytotoxicity at and above 72 µg/mL. The IC50 values of ECSC were 15-fold higher than that of CSC. Transcriptome analyses indicated that cell injury-related processes were enriched after the treatment of CSC. CSC could significantly induce more oxidative stress and inflammatory signals than ECSC. ECSCs and their components induced significantly less cytotoxicity than CSC under the laboratory exposure conditions, and CSC caused much severe cell injuries. Our study adds to the body of scientific evidence for a more comprehensive safety evaluation of e-cigarette products as compared to cigarettes. • Among ten representative cell lines, BEAS-2B was the most sensitive cells in cell viability assay. • The condensates of components of flavored e-cigarettes tested had little toxic effects on BEAS-2B. • Multiple cell injury-related genes were enriched after CSC treatment using RNA-Seq analysis. • Cell injury effect of CSC was much greater than that of ECSC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03784274
Volume :
374
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Toxicology Letters
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
161141010
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2022.12.012