Perceptions of research capacity in public health organisations: comparison of NSW metropolitan and non-metropolitan Local Health Districts.

Objective: The aims of this study were to explore and compare the perceptions of research capacity and culture (RCC) in metropolitan and non-metropolitan New South Wales (NSW) Local Health Districts (LHDs). Methods: The Research Capacity and Culture Tool was delivered online to clinicians and health managers. A 10-point Likert scale of success or skill at organisational, team and individual level of research capacity was used. An independent t -test assessed differences in domain means between non-metropolitan and metropolitan LHDs. Results: A total of 1243 participants responded. Responses to the survey indicated the perception of individual's research skills were greater than the perception of RCC at both the team and organisational levels. Participants from metropolitan locations had significantly higher mean scores across all three domains compared with non-metropolitan locations (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Results indicated the perception of individual's research skills were greater than the team and organisational levels. Participants from metropolitan locations had significantly higher perceptions of RCC across all three domains compared with non-metropolitan locations. This was the largest study to date in Australia investigating RCC in NSW LHDs, and the first study to explore multiple professions across multiple organisations while comparing metropolitan and non-metropolitan settings. This research may inform targeted strategies for building research capacity in NSW LHDs. What is known about the topic? Challenges exist in the current healthcare system to provide the infrastructure and resources to build capacity and embed a culture of research. What does this paper add? This study was significant in its reach across NSW and its perspective of capturing multiple professions. What are the implications for practitioners? Factors found to be consistent across the state may be suggestive of prioritisation for further investigation and implementation at the state and/or national level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]