Sizing limitations of ultrasonic array images for non-sharp defects and their impact on structural integrity assessments.

• The Total focusing method (TFM) image-based approach presented for sizing non-sharp defects. • Parametric numerical and experimental full matrix capture datasets generated for imaging. • Measurement limitation and accuracy of notch parameters presented. • Impact of sizing inaccuracy on structural integrity assessment described. • Demonstrated the ability to distinguish between non-sharp defects. Existing structural integrity assessment procedures typically assume flaws to be infinitely sharp when they cannot be considered as local thinned areas. This assumption is often over-conservative, resulting in a pessimistic assessment of structural components and a significant underestimation of their margins of safety against fracture. One of the main challenges while adopting non-destructive evaluation techniques is distinguishing between sharp cracks (e.g., fatigue) and non-sharp defects and identifying the more severe ones. Towards this broader challenge, the present work aims to examine the sizing limitation and accuracy of ultrasonic array image-based techniques for non-sharp defects (surface breaking u-notches) and investigate how these measurements would affect the structural integrity assessment of components. Parametric numerical simulations and experimental measurements are performed to generate full-matrix capture datasets, which are then processed using the total focusing method to form an image. The image-based sizing approach is shown to perform efficiently for notch depths higher than the inspection wavelength (λ L), i.e. as small as 0.2 mm, and semi-notch widths as small as 0.1 mm. The influence of ultrasonic measurements on structural integrity assessments is highlighted using different case studies in the context of non-sharp defects of fatigue and fracture strength estimates. For the cases under analysis, resolving non-sharp defects led up to 5× and 3× values of effective fracture toughness and fatigue strength, respectively. We have also seen that a 30 % uncertainty in semi-notch width sizing would result in a 30 % and 20 % error in fatigue strength and fracture toughness estimations, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]