Back to Search Start Over

Potential Use of Data-Driven Models to Estimate and Predict Soybean Yields at National Scale in Brazil.

Authors :
Monteiro, Leonardo A.
Ramos, Rafael M.
Battisti, Rafael
Soares, Johnny R.
Oliveira, Julianne C.
Figueiredo, Gleyce K. D. A.
Lamparelli, Rubens A. C.
Nendel, Claas
Lana, Marcos Alberto
Source :
International Journal of Plant Production. Dec2022, Vol. 16 Issue 4, p691-703. 13p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Large-scale assessment of crop yields plays a fundamental role for agricultural planning and to achieve food security goals. In this study, we evaluated the robustness of data-driven models for estimating soybean yields at 120 days after sow (DAS) in the main producing regions in Brazil; and evaluated the reliability of the "best" data-driven model as a tool for early prediction of soybean yields for an independent year. Our methodology explicitly describes a general approach for wrapping up publicly available databases and build data-driven models (multiple linear regression—MLR; random forests—RF; and support vector machines—SVM) to predict yields at large scales using gridded data of weather and soil information. We filtered out counties with missing or suspicious yield records, resulting on a crop yield database containing 3450 records (23 years × 150 "high-quality" counties). RF and SVM had similar results for calibration and validation steps, whereas MLR showed the poorest performance. Our analysis revealed a potential use of data-driven models for predict soybean yields at large scales in Brazil with around one month before harvest (i.e. 90 DAS). Using a well-trained RF model for predicting crop yield during a specific year at 90 DAS, the RMSE ranged from 303.9 to 1055.7 kg ha–1 representing a relative error (rRMSE) between 9.2 and 41.5%. Although we showed up robust data-driven models for yield prediction at large scales in Brazil, there are still a room for improving its accuracy. The inclusion of explanatory variables related to crop (e.g. growing degree-days, flowering dates), environment (e.g. remotely-sensed vegetation indices, number of dry and heat days during the cycle) and outputs from process-based crop simulation models (e.g. biomass, leaf area index and plant phenology), are potential strategies to improve model accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17356814
Volume :
16
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Plant Production
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
160254586
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s42106-022-00209-0