Primary vs patch‐based skin closure for in‐utero spina bifida repair.

MLA

Fishel Bartal, M., et al. “Primary vs Patch‐based Skin Closure for In‐utero Spina Bifida Repair.” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, vol. 60, no. 5, Nov. 2022, pp. 666–72. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26018.

APA

Fishel Bartal, M., Bergh, E. P., Tsao, K., Austin, M. T., Moise, K. J., Fletcher, S. A., Garnett, J., Mann, L., Hernandez, A. E., Johnson, A., & Papanna, R. (2022). Primary vs patch‐based skin closure for in‐utero spina bifida repair. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 60(5), 666–672. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.26018

Chicago

Fishel Bartal, M., E. P. Bergh, K. Tsao, M. T. Austin, K. J. Moise, S. A. Fletcher, J. Garnett, et al. 2022. “Primary vs Patch‐based Skin Closure for In‐utero Spina Bifida Repair.” Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology 60 (5): 666–72. doi:10.1002/uog.26018.