Back to Search
Start Over
Induction of labour involving an amniotomy: Waiting compared to immediate oxytocin.
- Source :
-
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology . Oct2022, Vol. 62 Issue 5, p795-799. 5p. - Publication Year :
- 2022
-
Abstract
- During induction of labour (IOL), the optimal timing of oxytocin following amniotomy is unknown, with limited data to guide decision‐making. This study aimed to see whether a 2‐h delay after amniotomy before starting oxytocin during IOL reduced the use of oxytocin as well as other positive or negative impact. A propensity‐score‐matched cohort study assessed the maternal, neonatal and process outcomes of 1168 women (584 per group) comparing immediate oxytocin to a 2‐h delay ('wait') after amniotomy. Women who waited were significantly less likely to receive oxytocin (61.2 vs 100%, P < 0.001) but more likely to receive antibiotics (14.7 vs 10.3%, P = 0.021), to be delivered by caesarean section (20.0 vs 14.6%, P = 0.013) and to be exclusively breastfeeding during discharge (77.2 vs 71.2%, P = 0.019). These findings provide further information for women and caregivers regarding the risks and benefits of a short delay before starting oxytocin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- *OXYTOCIN
*STATISTICAL significance
*INDUCED labor (Obstetrics)
*TIME
*FETAL membranes
*RETROSPECTIVE studies
*FISHER exact test
*MANN Whitney U Test
*TREATMENT effectiveness
*PREGNANCY outcomes
*DESCRIPTIVE statistics
*CHI-squared test
*DECISION making
*CESAREAN section
*LOGISTIC regression analysis
*DATA analysis software
*LONGITUDINAL method
*CAUSAL models
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00048666
- Volume :
- 62
- Issue :
- 5
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 159726169
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13544