Supreme Court review.

The Court further observed that Mississippi's ownership approach would allow an upstream state to completely cut off flow to a downstream one, a result contrary to the Court's equitable apportionment jurisprudence. Tennessee's exception was simple: the special master erred in recommending the Court grant Mississippi leave to seek equitable apportionment because, in Tennessee's view, granting leave to amend would allow Mississippi to sidestep the stringent pleading standards of equitable apportionment. This issue of Trends' Supreme Court Review provides a summary of selected environmental, energy, and natural resources cases decided by the U.S. Supreme Court (Court) during its October 2021 Term. [Extracted from the article]