Comparison Between Percutaneous Kyphoplasty and Percutaneous Vertebroplasty in Terms of Efficacy in Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures: A Meta-analysis.

<bold>Background and Aim: </bold>Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) are acknowledged to be common fractures, especially in the elderly population. Minimally invasive percutaneous methods of treatment for these fractures such as kyphoplasty (KP) and vertebroplasty (VP) have been valid and effective tools for decreasing clinical problems, which are associated with more beneficial effects compared with traditional methods such as open surgery or conservative treatment. Hence, we conducted the current meta-analysis in order to gather updated evidence for the systematic assessment of clinical and radiographic outcomes of KP compared with VP.<bold>Methods: </bold>We searched articles published based on the electronic databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. Publications of studies comparing KP with VP in the treatment of OVCFs were collected. After rigorous and thorough review of study quality, we extracted the data on the basis of eligible trials, which analyzed the summary hazard ratios (HRs) of the end points of interest.<bold>Results: </bold>Our inclusion criteria involved a total of 6 studies. In total, data from 644 patients, 330 who received VP and 284 who received KP, were included in the review. There was no significant difference in either group in terms of visual analog scale (VAS) scores (MD = 0.17; 95% CI, -0.39 to 0.73; P = .56), risk of cement leakage (odds ratio [OR] = 1.31; 95% CI, 0.62 to 2.74; P = .47) or Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores (MD = 0.51; 95% CI, -1.87 to 2.88; P = .68). Nevertheless, the injected cement volume (MD = -0.52; 95% CI, -0.88 to -0.15; P = .005) in the VP group was linked to a markedly lower statistically significant trend compared with the KP group.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>This meta-analysis evaluated acceptable efficacy levels across the involved trials. VP injected cement volume had several advantages in this meta-analysis. Yet, no significant differences were observed in terms of VAS scores, ODI scores, or cement leakage when KP was compared to VP therapy. Given the combined results of our study, the optimal treatment for patients with OVCFs should be determined by further high-quality multicenter randomized controlled trials with longer follow-up and larger sample sizes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]