Back to Search Start Over

RET fusions as primary oncogenic drivers and secondary acquired resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors :
Wang, Chunyue
Zhang, Zhenlong
Sun, Yulan
Wang, Song
Wu, Mengmeng
Ou, Qiuxiang
Xu, Yang
Chen, Zhiming
Shao, Yang
Liu, Hong
Hou, Peifeng
Source :
Journal of Translational Medicine. 9/4/2022, Vol. 20 Issue 1, p1-13. 13p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>RET fusions are rare oncogenic drivers in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). While activating RET rearrangements are found in NSCLC patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) genetic alterations at resistance to EGFR inhibitors, the extent to which co-occurring genomic alterations exist and how they might affect prognosis or therapy response is poorly understood.<bold>Methods: </bold>Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to assess 380 baseline patients with primary RET fusions and 71 EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who acquired RET fusions after developing resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs).<bold>Results: </bold>Primary RET fusions were more likely associated with females and younger age, with KIF5B being the predominant fusion partner. In baseline patients, both SMAD4 (5.3% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.044) and MYC copy-number gain variants (6.9% vs. 0.0%, P = 0.009) were more frequently co-mutated with KIF5B-RET than CCDC6-RET. By contrast, CDKN2A (11.3% vs. 2.4%, P = 0.003) mutations were significantly enriched in CCDC6-RET-rearranged baseline patients. A significant increase in the proportion of CCDC6-RET was observed in acquired RET-rearranged patients (47.3% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). The median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients harboring RB1 and TP53 double-mutations (5.5 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.020) or ERBB2 amplification (5.6 vs. 10.0 months, P = 0.041) was significantly shorter than the wild-type counterparts. Moreover, we identified that RET fusions were more likely associated with acquired resistance (AR) to third-generation EGFR-TKIs than previous generations of EGFR-TKIs.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In conclusion, we depicted the mutational profiles of NSCLC patients who harbor RET fusions at baseline or after resistance to EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, our results suggest that RET fusions mediate secondary resistance to third-generation EGFR-TKIs and might be associated with poor prognosis in patients with NSCLC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14795876
Volume :
20
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Translational Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158884830
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-022-03593-3