Processes of preferential flow in a eurasian steppe under different scenarios.

• The PF contributed to the total infiltration was >50% • The control mechanisms of temporal and small-scale spatial characteristics on different types of preferential flow processes were clarified. • Environmental characteristics differed between two types of preferential flow. • The two types of preferential flow affected soil moisture parameters differently. The control mechanisms of temporal and small-scale spatial characteristics on different types of preferential flow (PF) processes during infiltration are still lacking. Two-year high-resolution in situ soil moisture profiles were used to investigate the controls of PF processes and its interaction with moisture and vegetation dynamics, which covers three hillslope positions (upslope–14˚, midslope–9˚, and downslope–4˚) and three vegetation treatments (bare ground, stubble grassland and natural grassland) in a typical semi-arid grassland of Eurasia. Two types of PF were identified. Non-sequential response (NSR) was taken as one indication of PF using the disordered response of soil moisture profiles to rainfall. Fast preferential flow in sequence response (PF-rate) was taken as another indicator when a measured maximum pore water rate higher than saturated hydraulic conductivity. The conditions for the occurrence of the two PFs were inconsistent and different from the studies which showed the higher probability of PFs under dryer conditions and with higher rainfall intensities. Small rainfall events with low rainfall intensity and relatively low soil moisture at most locations showed higher NSR frequency, which further highlight the strong dependence of NSR on hydrophobicity and macropore structure of the topsoil. Whereas a higher rainfall intensity increased PF-rate under wet conditions. Meanwhile, the occurrence of PF-rate was also significantly controlled by vegetation coverage, soil texture and saturated hydraulic conductivity of 5–10 cm soil layer. Furthermore, the frequency of PF was 15.9%–44.5%, and its contribution to the total infiltration was >50%. The water recession rate of NSR and PF was slower and faster than that of matrix flow, respectively. This demonstrates the importance of PF to water replenishment in scarce rain areas and the influence of combinations of spatial–temporal factors on different flow processes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]