Evaluation of Radiation Oncologist and Trainee Opinions on Residency Expansion, Possible Actions, and Training Program Accreditation Changes in the United States.

<bold>Purpose: </bold>The objective of this study was to sample the opinions of radiation oncologists and trainees in the United States regarding residency expansion, what action(s) should be taken to limit residency supply, if any, and the proposed Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) changes.<bold>Methods and Materials: </bold>An online survey was distributed to 1048 attending radiation oncologists by e-mail and approximately 800 residents through their program coordinators. The survey asked respondents to rank how strongly they agreed with certain statements regarding residency supply, possible solutions to address any perceived oversupply, and the proposed ACGME changes on a 1-to-10 disagreement-to-agreement scale. The 16% response rate yielded 294 responses for analysis.<bold>Results: </bold>Of the respondents, 90 (30%) were residents, and 204 (70%) were attendings, of whom 117 (57%) were academic and 87 (43%) were nonacademic. Eighty-six percent agreed that there is a residency oversupply issue, and 91% agreed that actions should be taken to limit residency expansion. On χ2 test, residents and attendings were similarly likely to agree that there is a residency oversupply issue (93% and 89%, P = .27), although residents were more likely to agree that this oversupply should be acted upon compared with attendings (100% and 88%, P < .01). Regarding possible solutions, respondents were most likely to agree that further expansion should be limited (90%), program requirements should be made more stringent (76%), and the use of the Supplemental Offer and Acceptance Program should be limited (69%). Proposed ACGME changes that respondents were most likely to agree with included requiring that programs have modern image guidance, stereotactic radiation therapy, and brachytherapy techniques (98%) and have 4+ faculty members and maintain a faculty-to-resident ratio of >1.5:1 (86%). Case log minimums most supported to be increased were 4 uterus (65%) and 11 postmastectomy breast (61%) simulations.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>The majority of respondents agree that there is a residency oversupply issue and that actions should be taken to limit residency expansion and make program requirements more stringent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]