Back to Search Start Over

ARIMA and ARIMA-ERNN models for prediction of pertussis incidence in mainland China from 2004 to 2021.

Authors :
Wang, Meng
Pan, Jinhua
Li, Xinghui
Li, Mengying
Liu, Zhixi
Zhao, Qi
Luo, Linyun
Chen, Haiping
Chen, Sirui
Jiang, Feng
Zhang, Liping
Wang, Weibing
Wang, Ying
Source :
BMC Public Health. 7/29/2022, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-11. 11p. 3 Charts, 5 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To compare an autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model with a model that combines ARIMA with the Elman recurrent neural network (ARIMA-ERNN) in predicting the incidence of pertussis in mainland China.<bold>Background: </bold>The incidence of pertussis has increased rapidly in mainland China since 2016, making the disease an increasing public health threat. There is a pressing need for models capable of accurately predicting the incidence of pertussis in order to guide prevention and control measures. We developed and compared two models for predicting pertussis incidence in mainland China.<bold>Methods: </bold>Data on the incidence of pertussis in mainland China from 2004 to 2019 were obtained from the official website of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. An ARIMA model was established using SAS (ver. 9.4) software and an ARIMA-ERNN model was established using MATLAB (ver. R2019a) software. The performances of these models were compared.<bold>Results: </bold>From 2004 to 2019, there were 104,837 reported cases of pertussis in mainland China, with an increasing incidence over time. The incidence of pertussis showed obvious seasonal characteristics, with the peak lasting from March to September every year. Compared with the mean squared error (MSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of the ARIMA model, those of the ARIMA-ERNN model were 81.43%, 95.97% and 80.86% lower, respectively, in fitting performance. In terms of prediction performance, the MAE, MSE and MAPE were 37.75%, 56.88% and 43.75% lower, respectively.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>The fitting and prediction performances of the ARIMA-ERNN model were better than those of the ARIMA model. This provides theoretical support for the prediction of infectious diseases and should be beneficial to public health decision making. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
14712458
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
BMC Public Health
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158273423
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13872-9