Back to Search Start Over

Optimizing a Model of Coseismic Rupture for the 22 July 2020 MW 7.8 Simeonof Earthquake by Exploiting Acute Sensitivity of Tsunami Excitation Across the Shelf Break.

Authors :
Bai, Yefei
Liu, Chengli
Lay, Thorne
Cheung, Kwok Fai
Ye, Lingling
Source :
Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth. Jul2022, Vol. 127 Issue 7, p1-21. 21p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The Shumagin seismic gap along the Alaska Peninsula experienced a major, MW 7.8, interplate thrust earthquake on 22 July 2020. Several available finite‐fault inversions indicate patchy slip of up to 4 m at 8–48 km depth. There are differences among the models in peak slip and absolute placement of slip on the plate boundary, resulting from differences in data distributions, model parameterizations, and inversion algorithms. Two representative slip models obtained from inversions of large seismic and geodetic data sets produce very different tsunami predictions at tide gauges and deep‐water pressure sensors (DART stations), despite having only secondary differences in slip distribution. This is found to be the result of the acute sensitivity of the tsunami excitation for rupture below the continental shelf in proximity to an abrupt shelf break. Iteratively perturbing seismic and geodetic inversions by constraining fault model extent along dip and strike, we obtain an optimal rupture model compatible with teleseismic P and SH waves, regional three‐component broadband and strong‐motion seismic recordings, hr‐GNSS time series and static offsets, as well as tsunami recordings at DART stations and regional and remote tide gauges. Slip is tightly bounded between 25 and 40 km depth, the up‐dip limit of slip in the earthquake is resolved to be well‐inland of the shelf break, and the rupture extent along strike is well‐constrained. The coseismic slip increased Coulomb stress on the shallow plate boundary extending to the trench, but the frictional behavior of the megathrust below the continental slope remains uncertain. Plain Language Summary: Several studies on the 22 July 2020 MW 7.8 thrust event have included finite‐fault inversions, yielding generally consistent slip models. However, none of these studies have fully considered the seismic and geodetic data together with the tsunami measurements at tide gauges and deep‐water pressure sensors. We select two representative slip models obtained from prior seismic and geodetic inversions for tsunami modeling and find that they give distinct tsunami predictions despite having only a minor shift of slip by ∼20 km relative to shelf break. Large differences in tsunami excitation occur when seafloor deformation extends to the continental slope under deeper water. We perform iterative inversion of seismic and geodetic observations and forward modeling of tsunami signals to obtain an optimal slip model compatible with teleseismic waves, regional seismic recordings, hr‐GNSS time series and static offsets, along with tsunami recordings at DARTs and tide gauges. Precise placement of the slip distribution beneath the continental shelf controls the strength and timing of seaward tsunamis, with waveforms varying nonlinearly with seafloor deformation extending across the shelf break. The earthquake increased Coulomb stress on the shallow megathrust, but uncertainty in the shallow frictional behavior leaves it unclear whether a future large event can occur there. Key Points: Published finite‐fault models for the 2020 MW 7.8 earthquake predict varying tsunami signals despite having similar slip patternsThe tsunami excitation is very sensitive to the absolute placement of slip relative to the shelf break and along strikeIteration of slip inversion parameters and tsunami predictions optimizes the model to fit all data well with slip only beneath the shelf [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21699313
Volume :
127
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Geophysical Research. Solid Earth
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
158253581
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1029/2022JB024484