Back to Search Start Over

Quality and accuracy of patient‐oriented Web‐based information regarding tooth avulsion.

Authors :
Nangia, Divya
Saini, Aakriti
Krishnan, Arunakshi
Sharma, Sidhartha
Kumar, Vijay
Chawla, Amrita
Logani, Ajay
Source :
Dental Traumatology. Aug2022, Vol. 38 Issue 4, p299-308. 10p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background/Aim: Tooth avulsion (TA) is a severe form of traumatic dental injury. The tooth's prognosis depends on the immediate measures taken. First responders are often laypeople, and the Internet is a favored platform to access health‐related information. The aim of this descriptive study was to evaluate the accuracy, quality, readability, and popularity of patient‐oriented web information regarding the emergency management of TA. Methods: Three search engines (Google, Bing, and Yahoo.com) were browsed with six VPNs using "knocked out tooth," "fallen out tooth," and "tooth avulsion" as keywords. The top 20 results for each were evaluated. Webpages were included if they had information oriented to caregivers. They were analyzed for accuracy (cutoff ≥95%). Quality of web pages was assessed using DISCERN and the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark. Readability was evaluated using Flesch‐Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fog (FOG), Coleman–Liau Index (CLI), and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG). Popularity was assessed by Alexa Popularity Rank (APR). Accurate and inaccurate webpages were compared using chi‐square analysis and the Mann–Whitney U test. Spearman's correlation between the studied metrics was established. A p <.05 was considered significant. Results: Seventy‐two webpages were included, of which 23 (32%) were accurate. The median DISCERN ratings for accurate and inaccurate webpages were 3.0 [2.5–3.0] and 3.0 [2.0–3.0], respectively (p =.331). Ten (44%) accurate and 12 (24.5%) inaccurate webpages had high‐quality JAMA (p =.089). The median readability scores for accurate webpages were FKGL (8 [6.75–9.2]), FOG (10.6 [9.55–12.3]), CLI (7 [6–7]), SMOG (6.7 [6.15–7.5]), while scores for the inaccurate webpages were FKGL (7.85 [6.275–8.525]), FOG (10.55 [8.875–11.425]), CLI (7 [7–8.25]), and SMOG (7 [6.2–7.925]), with a higher CLI score for inaccurate webpages (p =.0035). The median APRs for accurate and inaccurate webpages were 1,02,538 [26,852–14,43,755] and 7,63,190 [2,19,799–29,92,067], respectively (p =.163). Accuracy had a positive correlation with quality (DISCERN: rho =.293, p =.013; JAMA: rho =.249, p =.036), while popularity (APR) was negatively correlated with quality (DISCERN: rho = −.330, p =.013; JAMA: rho = −.287, p =.032). Conclusion: Relevant webpages were limited and had low accuracy. This can impact the emergency management by laypeople and adversely affect the prognosis following avulsion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
16004469
Volume :
38
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Dental Traumatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157990160
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12741