Back to Search Start Over

How to be a Good Reviewer for a Scientific Journal.

Authors :
Siau, Keith
Kulkarni, Anand V.
El-Omar, Emad
Source :
Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hepatology. Jul2022, Vol. 12 Issue 4, p1238-1243. 6p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

In academia, peer-review refers to a fundamental quality control process whereby external experts (reviewers) are invited to provide unbiased critique of a paper (or other submitted material) and advise on suitability for publication. The process must be robust and conducted with honor and integrity and to the highest professional standards. It is not only the responsibility of the authors but also the reviewers to assess the manuscript appropriately and help in improving the quality of the finished article. A good reviewer not only assists the editors and the journal but can also benefit the authors, the wider scientific community and the general readership. In this article, we discuss the salient features of the peer-review process and tips for undertaking peer-review on scientific papers in an effective and professional manner, including opportunities to develop reviewer skills. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09736883
Volume :
12
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Clinical & Experimental Hepatology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157744962
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jceh.2022.04.006