Back to Search Start Over

The impact of the euthanasia assessment procedure: a qualitative interview study among adults with psychiatric conditions.

Authors :
Verhofstadt, Monica
Chambaere, Kenneth
Pardon, Koen
Mortier, Freddy
Liégeois, Axel
Deliens, Luc
Audenaert, Kurt
Source :
BMC Psychiatry. 6/27/2022, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p1-15. 15p. 5 Charts.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Assisted dying for adults with psychiatric conditions (APC) is highly controversial but legally possible in a few countries, including Belgium. Previous research has suggested that the complex euthanasia assessment procedure may cause additional suffering in APC but may also induce positive experiences. This study reports on the impact of the euthanasia assessment procedure as experienced by APC on three counts: 1) their mental state, including death ideation; 2) their treatment trajectory; 3) their social relationships. Methods: We performed an in-depth qualitative interview study with 16 APC in Flanders, Belgium, who had voiced a euthanasia request between 2016–2020. Thematic coding was used. Findings: We interviewed 16 APC. Euthanasia assessment procedures brought out a plethora of experiences in APC, both favourable and unfavourable. Whereas thoughts of suicide remain present to a certain extent, being in the assessment procedure allows some APC to reconsider alternatives towards life, and also to attempt new treatment options. However, many APC experience ambivalence about the supposedly inherent desirability and dignity in euthanasia. Worries also surfaced about the rationale behind and effects of involvement of APCs' social circle, and about the impact it could have on them. Conclusion: Further research, including other stakeholder perspectives, is recommended with a view to maximising favourable and minimising unfavourable impacts for all involved. In clinical practice attention to these impacts is paramount, and clear communication and management of expectations between physician and patient, seems appropriate to address the many ambivalent experiences that accompany APC during the euthanasia assessment procedure. Policy attention could in this regard go to clarifying certain sources of ambivalence and issues that are insufficiently addressed, such as modalities of relatives' involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471244X
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
BMC Psychiatry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157667155
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-022-04039-2