Experimental study on damage magnification effect of lightweight auxetic honeycomb protective panels under close-in blast loads.

Sandwich panels/sacrificial cladding systems composed of an auxetic core sandwiched between two faceplates can be considered an effective protective measure for reinforced concrete structures from blast loads. In this study, the effectiveness of re-entrant honeycomb core sandwich (RHS) protective panel systems, which exhibit a negative Poisson's ratio, to protect one-way simply supported reinforced concrete (RC) slabs subjected to a close-range detonation from high explosive charges was experimentally evaluated. Three large-scale field blast trials were carried out, namely an RC slab without protection as the reference test and two RC slabs with RHS protective systems under similar blast loading conditions. The RC slabs with RHS protective systems experienced catastrophic failure, unlike the unprotected reference slab that experienced only localised concrete damage. LS-DYNA numerical models were validated and agreed well with the experimental results. It was demonstrated that the transferred blast impulse to the main structure can be magnified by a factor of 1.6 by using an RHS protective system compared to an unprotected structure. Furthermore, the effect of the mass of the protective system was numerically studied. The numerical results showed that the blast protection level of the main structure is governed by the inertial resistance of the protective system rather than through energy absorption of the auxetic honeycomb core structure. • Response of RC panels protected by auxetic sandwich panels to close-in explosion is investigated experimentally and numerically. • The damage magnification effect of the auxetic sandwich panels is captured experimentally which has not been reported so far. • The impulse transferred to the main structure could be magnified by a factor of 1.6 compared to the unprotected structure. • The duality of energy absorption and inertial resistance of auxetic protective systems need to be considered at close standoff distances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]