Back to Search Start Over

Clinical use of low-dose parenteral anticoagulation, incidence of major bleeding and mortality: a multi-centre cohort study using the French national health data system.

Authors :
Bouget, Jacques
Balusson, Frédéric
Kerbrat, Sandrine
Roy, Pierre-Marie
Viglino, Damien
Lacut, Karine
Pavageau, Laure
Oger, Emmanuel
Source :
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. Jul2022, Vol. 78 Issue 7, p1137-1144. 8p. 1 Chart, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Purpose: Low-dose parenteral anticoagulation has demonstrated its efficacy for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in randomized trials. However, current practice is not widely documented. In ambulatory settings, we aimed to provide an overview of the clinical use of low-dose parenteral anticoagulation in France and to assess the incidence of major bleeding and death rates. Methods: A population-based prospective cohort study using the French national health data system (SNIIRAM) identified 142,815 adults living in five well-defined geographical areas who had a course of low-dose parenteral anticoagulants (a total of 150,389 courses) in the period 2013–2015. The main outcome measures were the types of low-dose parenteral anticoagulant, the duration and the clinical context. Adjusted incidence rate ratios (IRR) were derived from Poisson models. Results: Enoxaparin was the most frequently prescribed anticoagulant (58.9%) followed by tinzaparin (27.3%) and fondaparinux (10.9%). Patients receiving unfractionated heparin (N = 766, 0.53%) were older, more frequently had renal disease (48.75%) and had a higher modified HAS-B(L)ED score (≥ 3 in 61.6%) than patients receiving low-molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Surgical thrombo-prophylaxis was the most frequent indication (47.6%), followed by medical prophylaxis (29.9%). Course durations were in line with regulatory agency specifications. Only 43 (0.028%) major bleeding events and 478 (0.32%) deaths were observed. Adjusted IRRs for major bleeding or death were not significantly different for dalteparin/nadroparin, tinzaparin or fondaparinux compared to enoxaparin. Conclusion: Very low incidence rates of major bleeding and all-cause mortality were observed. Our study confirms the safety of LMWHs and fondaparinux in thrombo-prophylaxis in ambulatory settings. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02886533. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00316970
Volume :
78
Issue :
7
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157415228
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-022-03318-x