Fidelity evaluation of the dialogue around respiratory illness treatment (DART) program communication training.

<bold>Objective: </bold>To evaluate receipt fidelity of communication training content included in a multifaceted intervention known to reduce antibiotic over-prescribing for pediatric acute respiratory tract infections (ARTIs), by examining the degree to which clinicians implemented the intended communication behavior changes.<bold>Methods: </bold>Parents were surveyed regarding clinician communication behaviors immediately after attending 1026 visits by children 6 months to < 11 years old diagnosed with ARTIs by 53 clinicians in 18 pediatric practices. Communication outcomes analyzed were whether clinicians: (A) provided both a combined (negative + positive) treatment recommendation and a contingency plan (full implementation); (B) provided either a combined treatment recommendation or a contingency plan (partial implementation); or (C) provided neither (no implementation). We used mixed effects multinomial logistic regression to determine whether these 3 communication outcomes changed between baseline and the time periods following each of 3 training modules.<bold>Results: </bold>After completing the communication training, the adjusted probability of clinicians fully implementing the intended communication behavior changes increased by an absolute 8.1% compared to baseline (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 2.4%, 13.8%, p = .005).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Our findings support the receipt fidelity of the intervention's communication training content.<bold>Practical Implications: </bold>Clinicians can be trained to implement communication behaviors that may aid in reducing antibiotic over-prescribing for ARTIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]