Comparative effectiveness of hysteroscopic and laparoscopic sterilization for women: a retrospective cohort study.

<bold>Objective: </bold>To compare real-world effectiveness of hysteroscopic to laparoscopic sterilization.<bold>Design: </bold>Retrospective cohort of Medicaid claims for hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilization procedures performed in California, 2008-2014. After excluding postpartum procedures, we applied log-linear (Poisson) event-history regression models for clustered person-period data, weighted for propensity to receive either sterilization procedures, and adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables to examine the poststerilization pregnancy rates.<bold>Setting: </bold>Clinics, hospitals.<bold>Patient(s): </bold>Women aged 18-50 years with Medicaid claims between January 1, 2008, and August 31, 2014.<bold>Intervention(s): </bold>Hysteroscopic or laparoscopic sterilization procedure.<bold>Main Outcome Measure(s): </bold>Poststerilization pregnancy measured by pregnancy-related claims.<bold>Result(s): </bold>Among women with hysteroscopic (n = 5,906) or laparoscopic (n = 23,965) sterilization, poststerilization pregnancy claims were identified for 4.74% of women after hysteroscopic sterilization and 5.57% after laparoscopic sterilization. The pregnancy rates decreased over time after either procedure. Twelve months after the procedure, the crude incidence of pregnancy claims was higher for hysteroscopic sterilization than for laparoscopic sterilization (3.26 vs. 2.61 per 100 woman-years), but the propensity-weighted adjusted incidence rate ratio was 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.85-1.26). Between 13 and 24 months after the procedure, there were fewer pregnancies for women after hysteroscopic sterilizations than for those after laparoscopic sterilizations (adjusted incidence rate ratio, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.45-0.88]), with no statistically significant differences in later years. The cumulative pregnancy rates 5 years after sterilization were lower with hysteroscopic sterilization than with laparoscopic sterilization (6.26 vs. 7.22 per 100 woman-years; propensity-weighted, adjusted risk ratio, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.62-0.90]). The poststerilization pregnancy rates varied by age and race/ethnicity.<bold>Conclusion(s): </bold>The pregnancy rates after female sterilization are higher than expected, whether performed hysteroscopically or laparoscopically. These findings are reassuring that the effectiveness of hysteroscopic sterilization was not inferior to laparoscopic sterilization.<bold>Clinical Trial Registration Number: </bold>NCT03438682. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]