Back to Search Start Over

Classical vs. reactive distillation technologies for biodiesel production: An environmental comparison using LCA methodology.

Authors :
Galusnyak, Stefan Cristian
Petrescu, Letitia
Cormos, Calin-Cristian
Source :
Renewable Energy: An International Journal. Jun2022, Vol. 192, p289-299. 11p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Sustainable fuels and technologies are expected to significantly contribute towards climate change mitigation considering that the transportation sector provides a 23% share out of the total CO 2 emissions. Biodiesel is a green fuel produced by transesterification of triglycerides with an alcohol in the presence of a catalyst. The current study entails modelling and simulation of biodiesel production, through an acid transesterification process, using both classic and intensified methods, coupled with an environmental impact analysis performed following the Life Cycle Assessment methodology. The traditional biodiesel production consists in the synthesis and separation sections, while the intensified method is based on reactive distillation. ChemCAD software was used to simulate and evaluate the processes from a technical point of view. Methanol is generated using CO 2 and H 2 , this method being considered as a new approach for CO 2 utilization. Water electrolysis is employed for H 2 generation, with either biomass or natural gas as power source. A cradle-to-gate environmental analysis is performed within the current research by means of GaBi software, considering the following system boundaries: i) upstream processes: catalyst supply chain, sunflower oil supply chain, natural gas supply chain, limestone extraction and decomposition, ii) main-processes: methanol and biodiesel production, iii) downstream processes: disposal of wastes. ReCiPe method was chosen as the impact assessment method. High purities for the main product and by-product are obtained (i.e., purities higher than 99%). The outcome of the process simulation points to the conclusion that the intensified path gives better performances from technical point of view. The environmental results show that the classic approach performs better when CO 2 and H 2 are used as raw materials, while reactive distillation displays a higher efficiency when natural gas is used as feedstock. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09601481
Volume :
192
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Renewable Energy: An International Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
157001442
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.04.110