Back to Search Start Over

Inhibition of a cortico-thalamic circuit attenuates cue-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in "relapse prone" male rats.

Authors :
Kuhn, Brittany N.
Campus, Paolo
Klumpner, Marin S.
Chang, Stephen E.
Iglesias, Amanda G.
Flagel, Shelly B.
Source :
Psychopharmacology. Apr2022, Vol. 239 Issue 4, p1035-1051. 17p. 1 Diagram, 6 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Rationale: Relapse often occurs when individuals are exposed to stimuli or cues previously associated with the drug-taking experience. The ability of drug cues to trigger relapse is believed to be a consequence of incentive salience attribution, a process by which the incentive value of reward is transferred to the reward-paired cue. Sign-tracker (ST) rats that attribute enhanced incentive value to reward cues are more prone to relapse compared to goal-tracker (GT) rats that primarily attribute predictive value to such cues. Objectives: The neurobiological mechanisms underlying this individual variation in relapse propensity remains largely unexplored. The paraventricular nucleus of the thalamus (PVT) has been identified as a critical node in the regulation of cue-elicited behaviors in STs and GTs, including cue-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior. Here we used a chemogenetic approach to assess whether "top-down" cortical input from the prelimbic cortex (PrL) to the PVT plays a role in mediating individual differences in relapse propensity. Results: Chemogenetic inhibition of the PrL-PVT pathway selectively decreased cue-induced reinstatement of drug-seeking behavior in STs, without affecting behavior in GTs. In contrast, cocaine-primed drug-seeking behavior was not affected in either phenotype. Furthermore, when rats were characterized based on a different behavioral phenotype—locomotor response to novelty—inhibition of the PrL-PVT pathway had no effect on either cue- or drug-induced reinstatement. Conclusions: These results highlight an important role for the PrL-PVT pathway in vulnerability to relapse that is consequent to individual differences in the propensity to attribute incentive salience to discrete reward cues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00333158
Volume :
239
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Psychopharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
156154943
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-021-05894-9