Back to Search Start Over

Scaling up Quality Improvement for Surgical Teams (QIST)—avoiding surgical site infection and anaemia at the time of surgery: a cluster randomised controlled trial of the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to introduce change in the NHS

Authors :
Scrimshire, Ashley Brian
Booth, Alison
Fairhurst, Caroline
Coleman, Elizabeth
Malviya, Ajay
Kotze, Alwyn
Tiplady, Chris
Tate, David
Laverty, Annie
Davis, Gillian
Tadd, Win
Corbacho, Belen
Torgerson, David J.
McDaid, Catriona
Reed, Mike
the QIST collaborators
Burgess, Mark
Lowdon, Gail
Marriott, Allan
Cadwallader, Sue
Source :
Implementation Science. 3/12/2022, Vol. 17 Issue 1, p1-16. 16p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>The aim of this trial was to assess the effectiveness of quality improvement collaboratives to implement large-scale change in the National Health Service (NHS) in the UK, specifically for improving outcomes in patients undergoing primary, elective total hip or knee replacement.<bold>Methods: </bold>We undertook a two-arm, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing the roll-out of two preoperative pathways: methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) decolonisation (infection arm) and anaemia screening and treatment (anaemia arm). NHS Trusts are public sector organisations that provide healthcare within a geographical area. NHS Trusts (n = 41) in England providing primary, elective total hip and knee replacements, but that did not have a preoperative anaemia screening or MSSA decolonisation pathway in place, were randomised to one of the two parallel collaboratives. Collaboratives took place from May 2018 to November 2019. Twenty-seven Trusts completed the trial (11 anaemia, 16 infection). Outcome data were collected for procedures performed between November 2018 and November 2019. Co-primary outcomes were perioperative blood transfusion (within 7 days of surgery) and deep surgical site infection (SSI) caused by MSSA (within 90 days post-surgery) for the anaemia and infection trial arms, respectively. Secondary outcomes were deep and superficial SSIs (any organism), length of hospital stay, critical care admissions and unplanned readmissions. Process measures included the proportion of eligible patients receiving each preoperative initiative.<bold>Results: </bold>There were 19,254 procedures from 27 NHS Trusts included in the results (6324 from 11 Trusts in the anaemia arm, 12,930 from 16 Trusts in the infection arm). There were no improvements observed for blood transfusion (anaemia arm 183 (2.9%); infection arm 302 (2.3%) transfusions; adjusted odds ratio 1.20, 95% CI 0.52-2.75, p = 0.67) or MSSA deep SSI (anaemia arm 8 (0.13%); infection arm 18 (0.14%); adjusted odds ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.42-2.46, p = 0.98). There were no significant improvements in any secondary outcome. This is despite process measures showing the preoperative pathways were implemented for 73.7% and 61.1% of eligible procedures in the infection and anaemia arms, respectively.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Quality improvement collaboratives did not result in improved patient outcomes in this trial; however, there was some evidence they may support successful implementation of new preoperative pathways in the NHS.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>Prospectively registered on 15 February 2018, ISRCTN11085475. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17485908
Volume :
17
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Implementation Science
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155756324
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-022-01193-9