Back to Search Start Over

Food immunotherapy practice: Nation differences across Europe, the FIND project.

Authors :
Rodríguez del Río, Pablo
Alvarez‐Perea, Alberto
Blumchen, Katharina
Caimmi, Davide
Caubet, Jean Christoph
Konstantinopoulos, Anastasios Panagiotis
Riggioni, Carmen
Fassio, Filippo
Karakoc‐Aydiner, Elif
Le, Thuy May
Patel, Nandinee
Savolainen, Johannes
Vazquez‐Ortiz, Marta
Alvaro Lozano, Montserrat
Source :
Allergy. Mar2022, Vol. 77 Issue 3, p920-932. 13p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Background: Food allergen immunotherapy (FA‐AIT) practice is known to vary globally. This project aims to identify and characterize European centres performing FA‐AIT. Methods: An EAACI task force conducted an online survey to gather relevant information regarding FA‐AIT practice and setting‐specific resources after reviewing the published literature and congress abstracts throughout Europe. Results: We identified 102 FA‐AIT centres in 18 countries; only Spain (n = 39) and France (n = 16) had ≥10 such centres. Overall, most facilities were hospital‐based (77.5%), publicly funded (80.4%) and delivered FA‐AIT as routine clinical care (80.4%). On average, departments had 3 allergists/paediatric allergists and 2 nurses. Surveyed centres had provided FA‐AIT for a median of 9 years [1–24] to a median of 105 [5–2415] patients. The estimated total number of treated patients was 24875, of whom 41.3% received AIT for milk, 34.2% egg, 12.8% peanut and 11.7% other foods. Anaphylaxis to AIT doses requiring over 4–6 h of observation was reported by 70.6% of centres, ICU admissions by 10.8% and eosinophilic esophagitis by 45.1%. Quality of life and sustained unresponsiveness were evaluated in 20.6% and 54.9% of centres, respectively. The main contraindications for food AIT were severe asthma (57%‐63%), eosinophilic esophagitis (56%‐48%) and age below 5 years (47%‐41%). Conclusions: In Europe, FA‐AIT is provided mostly in clinical practice. Significant variation is seen in the number of centres per country, facility characteristics and inclusion/exclusion criteria, and in certain aspects of protocols. Potential inequality in access to AIT has been identified as well as the need for education and guidance for treatment standardization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01054538
Volume :
77
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Allergy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155474099
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15016