Back to Search Start Over

Understanding dual career views of European university athletes: The more than gold project focus groups.

Authors :
Capranica, Laura
Doupona, Mojca
Abelkalns, Ilvis
Bisenieks, Ugis
Sánchez-Pato, Antonio
Cánovas-Alvarez, Francisco José
Figueiredo, António J.
García-Roca, Juan Alfonso
Leiva-Arcas, Alejandro
Meroño, Lourdes
Paegle, Anda
Radu, Liliana-Elisabeta
Rus, Cristian-Mihail
Rusu, Oana-Mihaela
Sarmento, Hugo
Stonis, Janis
Vaquero-Cristóbal, Raquel
Vaz, Vasco
Ghinassi, Barbara
Izzicupo, Pascal
Source :
PLoS ONE. 2/25/2022, Vol. 18 Issue 2, p1-20. 20p.
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

Previous studies have found that student-athletes (S-As) have difficulties in achieving dual career (DC) success. However, no studies have analysed the opinion of the S-As on the functioning of DC with a qualitative methodology. The aim of the present work was to collect the opinions of elite university S-As in relation to DC policy adopted by their academic institutions in different European countries. In total, 77 athletes (F = 35, M = 42; age range: 20–25 years) participated in 15 national face-to-face focus groups in five different countries, to discuss aspects that higher education institutes should implement in relation to: 1) the athletes' needs; 2) assistance/tutorship: 2) curricula requirements; 3) financial support; 4) logistic support; 5) social support; and 6) dual career policies. Fifty of the athletes competed in individual sports and twenty-seven team sports. Of them, 57 was enrolled at undergraduate, 17 was enrolled in a master and 3 in a PhD. The athletes were presented with 13 open-ended questions one by one, and were ensured freedom to interact. All the discussions were recorded. After this, a general discussion took place in which the participants identified and agreed on a final list of statements from their focus group deemed to be relevant to DC athletes as university students. Then, at a consensus meeting, the findings were combined, repetitions were eliminated, and fragmented statements were condensed into broader ones. A final list of 31 statements, organized in six related content units, were identified in relation to the athletes' needs (n = 5), assistance/tutorship (n = 5), curricula requirements (n = 4), financial support (n = 4), logistic support (n = 4), social support (n = 6), and DC policies (n = 3), respectively. In conclusion, this cross-national qualitative research study synthesized the S-As views about their needs and the most relevant DC policies and provisions that higher education institutes should provide to ensure them with positive academic experiences towards the achievement of a degree. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
19326203
Volume :
18
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
PLoS ONE
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
155465656
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0264175