Effectiveness of manual therapy in patients with distal radius fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

To determine the effectiveness of manual therapy (MT) for functional outcomes in patients with distal radius fracture (DRF). An electronic search was performed in the Medline, Central, Embase, PEDro, Lilacs, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science databases. The eligibility criteria for selecting studies included randomized clinical trials that included MT techniques with or without other therapeutic interventions in functional outcomes, such as wrist or upper limb function, pain, grip strength, and wrist range of motion in patients older than 18 years with DRF. Eight clinical trials met the eligibility criteria; for the quantitative synthesis, six studies were included. For supervised physiotherapy plus joint mobilization versus home exercise program at 6 weeks follow-up, the mean difference (MD) for wrist flexion was 7.1 degrees (p = 0.20), and extension was 11.99 degrees (p = 0.16). For exercise program plus mobilization with movement versus exercise program at 12 weeks follow-up, the PRWE was −10.2 points (p = 0.02), the DASH was −9.86 points (p = 0.0001), and grip strength was 3.9 percent (p = 0.25). For conventional treatment plus manual lymph drainage versus conventional treatment, for edema the MD at 3–7 days was −14.58 ml (p = 0.03), at 17–21 days −17.96 ml (p = 0.009), at 33–42 days −15.34 ml (p = 0.003), and at 63–68 days −13.97 ml (p = 0.002). There was very low to high evidence according to the GRADE rating. Adding mobilization with movement and manual lymphatic drainage showed statistically significant differences in wrist, upper limb function, and hand edema in patients with DRF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]