Communicative trust in therapeutic encounters: users' experiences in public healthcare facilities and community pharmacies in Maputo, Mozambique.

Interactions between healthcare users and providers are an essential but often problematic element in therapeutic processes. In many settings worldwide, there has been a general recognition of the importance of adopting care approaches that understand patients as active agents, moving away from traditional paternalistic forms of interaction. Research shows that improving the quality of communication in therapeutic encounters fosters mutual understanding and cooperation in healthcare processes, helping to create the grounding conditions for building trusting relationships. But what are the communicative mechanisms through which trust in healthcare providers is cultivated? Going beyond the traditional 'doctor-patient' dyad analysis, and using data from a mixed-method study on medicine use in Maputo, Mozambique, this paper explores healthcare users' experiences and interpretations of their interactions with public healthcare professionals (medical doctors and prescribing nurses) and community pharmacy workers (pharmacists, technicians and other attendants). The analysis evolves around various communicative and relational aspects, emphasised by users as meaningful and underpinning different qualities of care, competence, integrity and trustworthiness. These attributes were assessed based on a combination of verbal conversation and information exchange, together with the use of other (non-verbal) situationally valued artefacts such as biomedical tools and communicative rituals performed by providers. This study shows that despite healthcare providers' different attributes of competence and authority, it is mainly their communicative performances during interactions that influence whether (symbolic) trust has the space to evolve or crystallise. Moreover, while performing certain rituals may be an effective form of communication, the lack of other (verbal and non-verbal) communicative elements during the interaction may compromise patient trust in what is being prescribed or advised. Efforts to improve the quality and responsiveness of healthcare services centred around citizens' needs should take users' perspectives into account and pay particular attention to these communicative and relational dimensions. • Care, competence and trustworthiness are assessed verbally and non-verbally. • Prescribers' communicative performances shape how users' symbolic trust manifests. • Using situationally valued biomedical techniques may be a way of communicating care. • Continuity of care allows repeated reassessments of providers' trustworthiness. • Medicines packaging can become a material basis of communicative trust. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]