Incongruent phylogenies and their implications for the study of diversification, taxonomy, and genome size evolution of Rhododendron.

Premise: Classification of taxa depends on the quality of inferred phylogenies. Rhododendron, a highly species‐rich genus (>1156 species) of woody plants, has a highly debated infrageneric classification, due to its huge diversity, homoplasy in key characters, and incongruence among data sets. We provide a broad coverage of representative species to resolve Rhododendron infrageneric phylogeny and highlight the areas of incongruence. We further investigate the effect of polyploidy and genome size evolution on diversification of Rhododendron. Methods: We generated two plastid and two nuclear loci for 260 Rhododendron species. We analyzed the loci separately as well as concatenated, utilizing both likelihood and Bayesian methods. We tested incongruence both among the data sets and with previous studies. We estimated genome sizes for 125 species through flow cytometry. Results: Our results suggest stronger support for larger subgenera; however, the smaller subgenera pose several problems; for example, R. tomentosum (former genus Ledum) occupies incongruent positions based on different DNA regions. The main shift to higher diversification in the genus occurs in the Himalayan/Southeast Asian clade of R. subg. Hymenanthes. We found that polyploidy occurs in almost all subgenera but most frequently within R. subg. Rhododendron sections Rhododendron and Schistanthe. Conclusions: We endorse the recognition of five major clades at the subgeneric level, but a number of species cannot be confidently assigned to these clades due to incongruency. With regard to genome size evolution, results support previous reports that genome sizes of tropical plants are lower than those of colder and temperate regions and that genome downsizing promotes diversification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]