Back to Search Start Over

Occupational radiation exposure in doctors: an analysis of exposure rates over 25 years.

Authors :
Sharkey, Amy R
Gambhir, Parthivi
Saraskani, Sepas
Walker, Ross
Hajilou, Ashcaan
Bassett, Paul
Sandhu, Navneet
Croasdale, Peter
Honey, Ian
Diamantopoulos, Athanasios
Goh, Vicky
Source :
British Journal of Radiology. Nov2021, Vol. 94 Issue 1127, p1-10. 10p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Healthcare professionals' occupational exposure to ionising radiation may be increasing due to increasing use of imaging and image-guided intervention. This study aims to assess the occupational exposure of doctors over a 25-year period at an NHS teaching hospital. Dosemeter measurements were collected prospectively from 1995 to 2019. Two retrospective analyses were performed over time (first including all measurements, second excluding "zero-dose" measurements), and by speciality. Group comparisons were undertaken using multilevel linear regression; a p-value <0.05 was deemed significant. 8,892 measurements (3,983 body, 1,514 collar, 649 eye, 2,846 hand), of which 3,350 were non-zero measurements (1,541 body, 883 collar, 155 eye, 771 hand), were included. Whole dataset analysis found a significant decrease in exposure for radiologists and cardiologists, as measured by body, hand and collar dosemeters over the last 25 years (p < 0.01 for all). The non-zero readings reflect the whole cohort analysis except in the case of eye dosemeters, which showed a significant decrease in exposure for cardiologists (p < 0.01), but a significant increase for radiologists and surgeons/anaesthetists (p < 0.01 for both). Whilst ionising radiation remains an occupational risk for doctors, the overall decreasing trend in occupational exposure is reassuring. However, a significant rise in eye dose for radiologists, surgeons and anaesthetists is concerning, and close monitoring is required to prevent future issues. This paper is one of few evaluating the occupational radiation exposure to doctors over a 25-year period, showing that although most dosemeter measurements reflect decreasing exposure, the increase in eye exposure warrants caution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00071285
Volume :
94
Issue :
1127
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
British Journal of Radiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
153198401
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20210602