Artículo de análisis de caso: TUTELA DE DERECHOS PARA CONOCER EL ÍNTEGRO DE LA DECLARACIÓN DEL COLABORADOR EFICAZ ¿ES LEGÍTIMO QUE EL FISCAL DECIDA QUÉ INFORMACIÓN BRINDADA POR EL COLABORADOR EFICAZ DEBE INCORPORARSE A LA INVESTIGACIÓN PRELIMINAR?

This article analyzes resolution No. 1 issued on March 20, 2019 by the Third National Court of Preparatory Investigation Specialized in Crimes of Corruption of Officials of the Superior Court of Justice Specialized in Crimes of Organized Crime and Corruption of Officials of the Judicial Branch of Peru. The objective is to determine if the way in which the Judge decided to reject the petition for protection of rights presented was legally correct, if the court ruling is duly and formally argued, and to establish how the petition for guardianship should have been resolved. The method used has been analytical, deductive-inductive, and applied. It is concluded that the request for protection of rights presented by the defense should have been declared unfounded after a hearing, since it is legitimate for the Prosecutor to decide what information provided by the Effective Collaborator should be incorporated into the criminal process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]