Back to Search
Start Over
An efficient hydrodynamic method for cross-flow turbines performance evaluation and comparison with the experiment.
- Source :
-
Renewable Energy: An International Journal . Dec2021, Vol. 180, p993-1003. 11p. - Publication Year :
- 2021
-
Abstract
- Renewable energies are getting ongoing growing interest and so are cross-flow turbines to harness water energy to produce electrical energy. Use of numerical methods to evaluate and predict this type of turbine performance can be of major help. This paper presents a Darrieus turbine numerical performance results. The present numerical method uses hydrodynamics theory applied to this turbine with three rotating blades, taking in consideration their relative angle of attack and hydrodynamic coefficients changes with the azimuthal angle. A comparison of these results with our experimental results is done for five water flow velocities (V = 0.43–0.73 m/s). The computer source code developed in this study allows determining this turbine torque, mechanical power and their coefficients. Good agreement between the numerical and experimental results is observed. For instance, for V = 0.73 m/s, the relative differences between the numerical and experimental maximal torque, mechanical power and their coefficients are respectively equal to 1.85%, 5.33%, 1.85% and 1.85%. The maximal torque and power relative differences vary respectively from 1.33% to 4.76% and from −3.95% to 10.40% for the other flow velocities. This new approach could be very useful because of its merit of providing a good performance evaluation of cross-flow turbines with much less computing time and much lower cost than computational fluid dynamics software methods. [Display omitted] • A novel-original method to evaluate cross-flow water or wind turbines performance. • Useful contribution in cross flow water and wind turbines design and development. • The source code allows determining the torque, power, torque and power coefficients. • Very good agreement between the experimental and numerical results. • A relative difference of 1.85% and 5.33%, respectively for the torque and power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 09601481
- Volume :
- 180
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Renewable Energy: An International Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 153031237
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.09.004