Back to Search Start Over

Maxillary molar root and canal morphology of Neolithic and modern Chinese.

Authors :
Ren, H.Y.
Kum, K.Y.
Zhao, Y.S.
Yoo, Y.J.
Jeong, J.S.
Perinpanayagam, Hiran
Wang, X.Y.
Li, G.J.
Wang, F.
Fang, H.
Gu, Y.
Source :
Archives of Oral Biology. Nov2021, Vol. 131, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize Neolithic human maxillary molars from archeological remains at the Jiaojia site, Shandong, China, and compare their ultrastructural features with sex and age-matched modern locals. Maxillary first (n = 86) and second (n = 80) molars in 5000-year-old individuals (n = 50) from the Jiaojia site were scanned by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Sex and age-matched control groups were assigned from oral surgical patients at Shandong University. Images were analyzed for crown size, root length, root morphology, canal inter-orifice distances, mesiobuccal canal morphology, and second mesiobuccal (MB2) canal prevalence and location. Neolithic and modern values were compared statistically using Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney test at p <.05. Crown and root size were smaller, and canal inter-orifice distances were shorter in Neolithic maxillary molars than their modern counterparts. For mesiobuccal roots, Weine's Type I single canals were the most prevalent in Neolithic and modern first and second molars. MB2 canal prevalence were not significantly different (p >.05) in Neolithic (53.3%) or modern (60.5%) first molars, and Neolithic (11.3%) or modern (21.3%) second molars. But, MB2 prevalence was significantly higher for modern than ancient male first (p =.032) and second (p =.005) molars. Additionally, MB2 were located more mesially and closer to MB1 in Neolithic than modern molars. Maxillary molar root and canal morphology of ancient 5000-year-old remains at the Jiaojia site resemble that of local patients. A trend towards larger tooth size, and more dispersed MB2 canals over this short evolutionary period warrants additional investigation. • Crown and root size were smaller in Neolithic maxillary molars than modern clinical cases. • Second mesiobuccal canals were less prevalent in Neolithic maxillary molars than their counterparts, especially in males. • Canal orifice locations were less dispersed in Neolithic than modern maxillary molars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00039969
Volume :
131
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Archives of Oral Biology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152847534
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2021.105272