Back to Search Start Over

Population-Wide Peer Comparison Audit and Feedback to Reduce Antibiotic Initiation and Duration in Long-Term Care Facilities with Embedded Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors :
Daneman, Nick
Lee, Samantha M
Bai, Heming
Bell, Chaim M
Bronskill, Susan E
Campitelli, Michael A
Dobell, Gail
Fu, Longdi
Garber, Gary
Ivers, Noah
Lam, Jonathan M C
Langford, Bradley J
Laur, Celia
Morris, Andrew
Mulhall, Cara
Pinto, Ruxandra
Saxena, Farah E
Schwartz, Kevin L
Brown, Kevin A
Source :
Clinical Infectious Diseases. 9/15/2021, Vol. 73 Issue 6, pe1296-e1304. 9p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background Antibiotic overprescribing in long-term care settings is driven by prescriber preferences and is associated with preventable harms for residents. We aimed to determine whether peer comparison audit and feedback reporting for physicians reduces antibiotic overprescribing among residents. Methods We employed a province wide, difference-in-differences study of antibiotic prescribing audit and feedback, with an embedded pragmatic randomized controlled trial (RCT) across all long-term care facilities in Ontario, Canada, in 2019. The study year included 1238 physicians caring for 96 185 residents. In total, 895 (72%) physicians received no feedback; 343 (28%) were enrolled to receive audit and feedback and randomized 1:1 to static or dynamic reports. The primary outcomes were proportion of residents initiated on an antibiotic and proportion of antibiotics prolonged beyond 7 days per quarter. Results Among all residents, between the first quarter of 2018 and last quarter of 2019, there were temporal declines in antibiotic initiation (28.4% to 21.3%) and prolonged duration (34.4% to 29.0%). Difference-in-differences analysis confirmed that feedback was associated with a greater decline in prolonged antibiotics (adjusted difference −2.65%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: −4.93 to −.28%, P =.026), but there was no significant difference in antibiotic initiation. The reduction in antibiotic durations was associated with 335 912 fewer days of treatment. The embedded RCT detected no differences in outcomes between the dynamic and static reports. Conclusions Peer comparison audit and feedback is a pragmatic intervention that can generate small relative reductions in the use of antibiotics for prolonged durations that translate to large reductions in antibiotic days of treatment across populations. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03807466. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10584838
Volume :
73
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152675385
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciab256