Back to Search Start Over

Adverse Events Associated with Intranasal Sprays: An Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Database and Literature Review.

Authors :
Ahsanuddin, Salma
Povolotskiy, Roman
Tayyab, Rahma
Nasser, Wissam
Barinsky, Gregory L.
Grube, Jordon G.
Paskhover, Boris
Source :
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology. Nov2021, Vol. 130 Issue 11, p1292-1301. 10p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background: Intranasal sprays (INSs) are commonly used medications for the treatment of many rhinologic conditions. Despite their popularity, an analysis of a nationwide reporting database and comparison to the available literature has never been performed. Methods: The Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database was accessed to obtain adverse event (AE) records from 2014 to 2019 for varying INSs, including: 10 corticosteroids, 1 alpha adrenergic, and 3 antihistamines. The Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRR) and Reporting Odds Ratios (ROR) were calculated for dyspnea, anosmia, ageusia/dysgeusia, epistaxis, and headache. A PRR ≥ 2 or ROR ≥ 1 was considered significant. Results: Corticosteroids had 98 864 total reported AEs to the database, followed by antihistamines (7011) and alpha adrenergics (2071). In total, dyspnea was reported 5843 times, followed by headache (4230), epistaxis (1205), ageusia/dysgeusia (920), and anosmia (312). Overall, PRR and ROR values for dyspnea ranged from 0.51 to 4.25 and 0.51 to 4.49; for dysgeusia/ageusia from 0.56 to 6.09 and 0.56 to 6.12; and for epistaxis from 1.03 to 27.24 and 1.03 to 30.76, respectively. All medications which listed anosmia within the top AEs had PRR and ROR values exceeding 2 and 1, respectively. The PRR for headache exceeded 2 for 1 medication and the ROR exceeded 1 in 7 medications. Conclusion: The AEs of dyspnea, anosmia, ageusia/dysgeusia, epistaxis, and headache are reported within the FAERS database for commonly prescribed INSs. When compared against the existing scientific literature, the clinical significance of this reporting tool from the FDA for these classes of medications remains unvalidated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00034894
Volume :
130
Issue :
11
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152624686
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/00034894211007222