Back to Search Start Over

Follow‐up practice and healthcare utilisation of colorectal cancer survivors.

Authors :
Qaderi, Seyed M.
Ezendam, Nicole P.M.
Verhoeven, Rob H.A.
Custers, Jose A.E.
de Wilt, Johannes H.W.
Mols, Floortje
Source :
European Journal of Cancer Care. Sep2021, Vol. 30 Issue 5, p1-11. 11p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objective: To examine healthcare utilisation and adherence to colorectal cancer (CRC) follow‐up guidelines. Methods: A total of 2450 out of 3025 stage I‐III CRC survivors diagnosed between 2000 and 2009 completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, SF‐12, EORTC QLQ‐CR38 and Fatigue Assessment Score questionnaires, in December 2010. Multivariable regression analyses were performed to identify predictors for increased follow‐up care (>1 visit than recommended by guidelines). Results: In the first follow‐up year, the average number of cancer‐related visits to the general practitioner and medical specialist was 1.7 and 4.2, respectively. More than 80% of the CRC survivors was comfortable with their follow‐up schedule, and 49–72% of them received follow‐up according to the guidelines. Around 29–47% was followed more than recommended. Simultaneously, around 4–14% of the CRC survivors received less follow‐up care than recommended. Survivors of stage III disease treated with chemotherapy received the most follow‐up care. In addition, lower socio‐economic status stoma and fatigue were associated with increased follow‐up care. Conclusion: CRC survivors were predominantly followed according to national guidelines. Increased follow‐up care is driven by advanced disease stage, chemotherapy, SES, stoma and fatigue. Future studies should investigate how increased follow‐up care use can be reduced, while still addressing patients' needs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09615423
Volume :
30
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
European Journal of Cancer Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152539113
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13472