Back to Search Start Over

Testing the effectiveness of community-engaged citizen science to promote physical activity, foster healthier neighborhood environments, and advance health equity in vulnerable communities: The Steps for Change randomized controlled trial design and methods

Authors :
King, Abby C.
Campero, Maria I.
Garcia, Dulce
Blanco-Velazquez, Isela
Banchoff, Ann
Fierros, Fernando
Escobar, Michele
Cortes, Ana L.
Sheats, Jylana L.
Hua, Jenna
Chazaro, Aldo
Done, Monica
Espinosa, Patricia Rodriguez
Vuong, Daniel
Ahn, David K.
Source :
Contemporary Clinical Trials. Sep2021, Vol. 108, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

While low-income midlife and older adults are disproportionately affected by non-communicable diseases that can be alleviated by regular physical activity, few physical activity programs have been developed specifically with their needs in mind. Those programs that are available typically do not address the recognized local environmental factors that can impact physical activity. The specific aim of the Steps for Change cluster-randomized controlled trial is to compare systematically the initial (one-year) and sustained (two-year) multi-level impacts of an evidence-based person-level physical activity intervention (Active Living Every Day [ALED] and age-relevant health education information), versus the ALED program in combination with a novel neighborhood-level citizen science intervention called Our Voice. The study sample (N = 300) consists of insufficiently active adults ages 40 years and over living in or around affordable senior public housing settings. Major study assessments occur at baseline, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome is 12-month change in walking, and secondary outcomes include other forms of physical activity, assessed via validated self-report measures supported by accelerometry, and physical function and well-being variables. Additional intervention impacts are assessed at 24 months. Potential mediators and moderators of intervention success will be explored to better determine which subgroups do best with which type of intervention. Here we present the study design and methods, including recruitment strategies and yields. clinicaltrial.gov Identifier = NCT03041415 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15517144
Volume :
108
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Contemporary Clinical Trials
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152495479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2021.106526