Back to Search Start Over

Cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing for monogenic disorders: confirmation of unaffected fetuses following preimplantation genetic testing.

Authors :
Toft, Christian Liebst Frisk
Ingerslev, Hans Jakob
Kesmodel, Ulrik Schiøler
Hatt, Lotte
Singh, Ripudaman
Ravn, Katarina
Nicolaisen, Bolette Hestbek
Christensen, Inga Baasch
Kølvraa, Mathias
Jeppesen, Line Dahl
Schelde, Palle
Vogel, Ida
Uldbjerg, Niels
Farlie, Richard
Sommer, Steffen
Østergård, Marianne Louise Vang
Jensen, Ann Nygaard
Mogensen, Helle
Kjartansdóttir, Kristín Rós
Degn, Birte
Source :
Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics. Aug2021, Vol. 38 Issue 8, p1959-1970. 12p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Purpose: Proof of concept of the use of cell-based non-invasive prenatal testing (cbNIPT) as an alternative to chorionic villus sampling (CVS) following preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M). Method: PGT-M was performed by combined testing of short tandem repeat (STR) markers and direct mutation detection, followed by transfer of an unaffected embryo. Patients who opted for follow-up of PGT-M by CVS had blood sampled, from which potential fetal extravillous throphoblast cells were isolated. The cell origin and mutational status were determined by combined testing of STR markers and direct mutation detection using the same setup as during PGT. The cbNIPT results with respect to the mutational status were compared to those of genetic testing of the CVS. Results: Eight patients had blood collected between gestational weeks 10 and 13, from which 33 potential fetal cell samples were isolated. Twenty-seven out of 33 isolated cell samples were successfully tested (82%), of which 24 were of fetal origin (89%). This corresponds to a median of 2.5 successfully tested fetal cell samples per case (range 1–6). All fetal cell samples had a genetic profile identical to that of the transferred embryo confirming a pregnancy with an unaffected fetus, in accordance with the CVS results. Conclusion: These findings show that although measures are needed to enhance the test success rate and the number of cells identified, cbNIPT is a promising alternative to CVS. Trial registration number: N-20180001 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10580468
Volume :
38
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152252846
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02104-5