Back to Search Start Over

First‐line combination chemotherapy with etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin for the treatment of disseminated germ cell cancer: Efficacy and feasibility in current clinical practice.

Authors :
Fujiwara, Motohiro
Tanaka, Hajime
Yuasa, Takeshi
Komai, Yoshinobu
Oguchi, Tomohiko
Fujiwara, Ryo
Numao, Noboru
Yamamoto, Shinya
Fujii, Yasuhisa
Fukui, Iwao
Yonese, Junji
Source :
International Journal of Urology. Sep2021, Vol. 28 Issue 9, p920-926. 7p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety profiles of first‐line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin and primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim as first‐line chemotherapy for disseminated germ cell cancer. Methods: This study reviewed 154 consecutive patients with previously untreated disseminated germ cell cancer who received first‐line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin between 1995 and 2020. Of these, 54 patients were managed with primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim (primary prophylaxis group), and 100 were managed with the therapeutic use of short‐acting granulocyte colony‐stimulating factor (non‐primary prophylaxis group). Results: The International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group classification identified 90 (58%)/40 (26%)/24 (16%) patients with good/intermediate/poor prognosis, respectively. Overall, 139 patients (90%) were disease free after etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin with/without post‐chemotherapy surgery. The median relative dose intensity of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin was 96%, and there was a significant difference between the primary prophylaxis and non‐primary prophylaxis groups (100% vs 90%, P < 0.01). The 5‐year salvage treatment‐free and overall survival rates were 83% and 94%, respectively. In total, 138 patients (90%) developed grade 4 hematological toxicities, and there were no treatment‐related deaths due to myelosuppression. Grade 4 neutropenia was less commonly observed in the primary prophylaxis group compared with the non‐primary prophylaxis group (80% vs 95%, P < 0.01). Conclusions: This is the largest study of first‐line etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin, and its sufficient efficacy and safety profiles are confirmed in current clinical practice. Primary prophylaxis using pegfilgrastim might further improve the feasibility of etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09198172
Volume :
28
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Urology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152229692
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14604