Back to Search Start Over

Impact of the planetary boundary layer on air quality simulations over the Yangtze River Delta region, China.

Authors :
Shi, Lishu
Zhu, Ansheng
Huang, Ling
Yaluk, Elly
Gu, Ying
Wang, Yangjun
Wang, Shunyao
Chan, Andy
Li, Li
Source :
Atmospheric Environment. Oct2021, Vol. 263, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The city clusters in eastern coastal China have suffered from serious air pollution in the past decades, which is partially related to the complex local topography and meteorological conditions. The planetary boundary layer (PBL) scheme is a critical parameter for accurate meteorology simulations and air quality predictions. In this study, we analyze the impact of four typical PBL schemes, namely, Yonsei University (YSU), Mellor-Yamada-Nakanishi-Niino Level 2.5 (MYNN), Asymmetric Convective Model version 2 (ACM2), and Mellor-Yamada-Janjic (MYJ) PBL, within the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model to assess their impacts on the simulations of air pollutant concentrations based on the Comprehensive Air Quality Model with Extensions (CAMx) for the Yangtze River Delta (YRD) region, one of the most developed city clusters in eastern China. The results indicate that the MYNN scheme performs best in terms of fine particulate matter (PM 2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) simulations, with mean bias of 4.8 μg m−3 and 9.3 μg m−3 in summer and 11.7 μg m−3 and 5.4 μg m−3 in winter, respectively. The YSU scheme performs best for ozone (O 3) prediction, with better simulation results in summer than in winter. Notably, some discrepancies among different PBL schemes in the prediction of air pollution are directly associated with the complex topography. For the prediction of PM 2.5 , the MYJ and YSU schemes tend to overestimate the concentrations in the plains of Jiangsu and northern Anhui while underestimating PM 2.5 in the hilly areas compared with the MYNN scheme. Meanwhile, the performance of the ACM2 scheme is opposite to that of the MYJ and YSU schemes. For O 3 predictions, MYJ overestimates O 3 in the eastern coastal area and underestimates O 3 in the inland areas in summer compared with the YSU scheme, while the ACM2 scheme is the opposite of the MYJ scheme, and the MYNN scheme consistently overestimates O 3. • Impacts from four PBL schemes within WRF on the simulation of air pollutants are evaluated over the YRD region. • Seasonal and diurnal variations of surface pollutant concentrations are predicted and discussed. • The MYNN scheme shows good performance for PM 2.5 and NO 2 , while the YSU scheme is most suitable for O 3 prediction in the YRD. • Implementing a single PBL scheme for a large area with complex topography is insufficient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13522310
Volume :
263
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Atmospheric Environment
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152160775
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2021.118685