Back to Search Start Over

Does Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Damage Really Increase Impulsiveness? Delay and Probability Discounting in Patients with Focal Lesions.

Authors :
Mok, Jenkin N. Y.
Green, Leonard
Myerson, Joel
Kwan, Donna
Kurczek, Jake
Ciaramelli, Elisa
Craver, Carl F.
Rosenbaum, R. Shayna
Source :
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. Sep2021, Vol. 33 Issue 9, p1909-1927. 19p. 1 Color Photograph, 3 Charts, 4 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

If the tendency to discount rewards reflects individuals' general level of impulsiveness, then the discounting of delayed and probabilistic rewards should be negatively correlated: The less a person is able to wait for delayed rewards, the more they should take chances on receiving probabilistic rewards. It has been suggested that damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) increases individuals' impulsiveness, but both intertemporal choice and risky choice have only recently been assayed in the same patients with vmPFC damage. Here, we assess both delay and probability discounting in individuals with vmPFC damage (n = 8) or with medial temporal lobe (MTL) damage (n = 10), and in age- and education-matched controls (n = 30). On average, MTL-lesioned individuals discounted delayed rewards at normal rates but discounted probabilistic rewards more shallowly than controls. In contrast, vmPFC-lesioned individuals discounted delayed rewards more steeply but probabilistic rewards more shallowly than controls. These results suggest that vmPFC lesions affect the weighting of reward amount relative to delay and certainty in opposite ways. Moreover, whereas MTL-lesioned individuals and controls showed typical, nonsignificant correlations between the discounting of delayed and probabilistic rewards, vmPFC-lesioned individuals showed a significant negative correlation, as would be expected if vmPFC damage increases impulsiveness more in some patients than in others. Although these results are consistent with the hypothesis that vmPFC plays a role in impulsiveness, it is unclear how they could be explained by a single mechanism governing valuation of both delayed and probabilistic rewards. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0898929X
Volume :
33
Issue :
9
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
152135780
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01721