Back to Search Start Over

Agreed – there is no need to switch the modified Arrhenius function back to the old form.

Authors :
Stinziano, Joseph R.
Murphy, Bridget K.
Source :
New Phytologist. Sep2021, Vol. 231 Issue 6, p2117-2117. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

4 Murphy BK, Stinziano JR. 2021a. A derivation error that affects carbon balance models exists in the current implementation of the modified Arrhenius function. Arrhenius, carbon balance, modeling, photosynthesis, temperature responses Keywords: Arrhenius; carbon balance; modeling; photosynthesis; temperature responses EN Arrhenius carbon balance modeling photosynthesis temperature responses 2117 2117 1 08/19/21 20210915 NES 210915 A response to Yin (2021) 'No need to switch the modified Arrhenius function back to the old f... Yin (2021) argues that the current implementation of the modified Arrhenius function (M2002; Medlyn I et al i ., 2002), which omits a term that was included in the original derivation, should be retained over the corrected version (J1942; see Johnson I et al i ., 1942; Murphy & Stinziano, 2021a). [Extracted from the article]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0028646X
Volume :
231
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
New Phytologist
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151957824
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.17565