Back to Search Start Over

Effect of Oral Azithromycin vs Placebo on COVID-19 Symptoms in Outpatients With SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors :
Oldenburg, Catherine E.
Pinsky, Benjamin A.
Brogdon, Jessica
Chen, Cindi
Ruder, Kevin
Zhong, Lina
Nyatigo, Fanice
Cook, Catherine A.
Hinterwirth, Armin
Lebas, Elodie
Redd, Travis
Porco, Travis C.
Lietman, Thomas M.
Arnold, Benjamin F.
Doan, Thuy
Source :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association. 8/10/2021, Vol. 326 Issue 6, p490-498. 9p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Importance: </bold>Azithromycin has been hypothesized to have activity against SARS-CoV-2.<bold>Objective: </bold>To determine whether oral azithromycin in outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14.<bold>Design, Setting, and Participants: </bold>Randomized clinical trial of azithromycin vs matching placebo conducted from May 2020 through March 2021. Outpatients from the US were enrolled remotely via internet-based surveys and followed up for 21 days. Eligible participants had a positive SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic test result (nucleic acid amplification or antigen) within 7 days prior to enrollment, were aged 18 years or older, and were not hospitalized at the time of enrollment. Among 604 individuals screened, 297 were ineligible, 44 refused participation, and 263 were enrolled. Participants, investigators, and study staff were masked to treatment randomization.<bold>Interventions: </bold>Participants were randomized in a 2:1 fashion to a single oral 1.2-g dose of azithromycin (n = 171) or matching placebo (n = 92).<bold>Main Outcomes and Measures: </bold>The primary outcome was absence of self-reported COVID-19 symptoms at day 14. There were 23 secondary clinical end points, including all-cause hospitalization at day 21.<bold>Results: </bold>Among 263 participants who were randomized (median age, 43 years; 174 [66%] women; 57% non-Hispanic White and 29% Latinx/Hispanic), 76% completed the trial. The trial was terminated by the data and safety monitoring committee for futility after the interim analysis. At day 14, there was no significant difference in proportion of participants who were symptom free (azithromycin: 50%; placebo: 50%; prevalence difference, 0%; 95% CI, -14% to 15%; P > .99). Of 23 prespecified secondary clinical end points, 18 showed no significant difference. By day 21, 5 participants in the azithromycin group had been hospitalized compared with 0 in the placebo group (prevalence difference, 4%; 95% CI, -1% to 9%; P = .16).<bold>Conclusions and Relevance: </bold>Among outpatients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, treatment with a single dose of azithromycin compared with placebo did not result in greater likelihood of being symptom free at day 14. These findings do not support the routine use of azithromycin for outpatient SARS-CoV-2 infection.<bold>Trial Registration: </bold>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04332107. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00987484
Volume :
326
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151897337
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11517