Relationship Between General Cognition, Visual Assessed Cortical Atrophy, and Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Alzheimer's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study from a Chinese PUMCH Cohort.

<bold>Background: </bold>Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers are widely accepted as manifestations of Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathogenesis and incorporated into biological definition of AD. However, the correlations between CSF and other biomarkers such as neuroimaging and neuropsychiatric evaluation are complicated and inconsistent.<bold>Objective: </bold>We aimed to better interpreting CSF biomarkers results accompanying with other indexes in improving accurate diagnosis of AD.<bold>Methods: </bold>112 AD patients and 30 cognitive normal controls were selected. Commercial accessible ELISA kits were introduced for measurement of CSF t-tau, p-tau181, Aβ1-42, and NfL based on standard protocol. MRI examinations were performed using a 3-T MRI scanner and visual rating scales including medial temporal atrophy score and Koedam's scale were used to evaluate medial temporal atrophy and posterior region atrophy.<bold>Results: </bold>CSF biomarkers' profile including decreased concentration of Aβ1-42, increased concentration of t-tau, p-tau181, t-tau/Aβ 1-42, and NfL were diagnostic between AD and control. CSF biomarkers profile was not influenced by the APOE genotype. Increased concentration of t-tau and NfL, as well as ratio of t-tau/Aβ 1-42 were related to decrease of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score while concentration of Aβ1-42 not. Visual assessed cortical atrophy was related to MMSE score, but most of the CSF biomarkers were not related to atrophy, except that increased concentration of p-tau181 was significantly associated with atrophy of posterior cortical region.<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Our results supported CSF biomarkers were helpful in diagnosis of AD. However, CSF biomarkers were cross-sectional reflection of pathogenesis, which did not correlate well with clinical progression. CSF biomarkers should be interpreted in combination with MRI and cognitive evaluation in clinical use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]