Back to Search Start Over

Trace explosives sampling for security applications (TESSA) study: Evaluation of procedures and methodology for contact sampling efficiency.

Authors :
Novosselov, Igor V.
Coultas-McKenney, Caralyn A.
Miroshnik, Leonid
Kottapalli, Kalyan
Ockerman, Byron
Manley, Tara E.
Gardner, Myles W.
Lareau, Richard
Brady, John
Sweat, Melissa
Smith, Alan R.
Hargather, Michael J.
Beaudoin, Stephen
Source :
Talanta. Nov2021, Vol. 234, pN.PAG-N.PAG. 1p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

The detection of trace amounts of explosive materials is critical to the security at mass transit centers (e.g., airports and railway stations). In a typical screening process, a trap is used to probe a surface of interest to collect and transfer particulate residue to a detector for analysis. The collection of residues from the surface being probed is widely viewed as the limiting step in this process. A multi-institutional study was performed to establish a methodology for the evaluation of sampling media collection efficiencies. Dry deposited residues of 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), C-4 (an RDX-based explosive), and pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN) were harvested from acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) plastic, ballistic nylon (NYL), and uncoated aluminum surfaces using muslin, Texwipe cotton, and stainless-steel mesh traps. Transfer and collection efficiencies of the sample media were calculated based on liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis. Dry transfer efficiencies (DTE%) to all tested surfaces were greater than 75%, with transfer to ABS plastic being the lowest. Collection efficiency (CE%) varied significantly across the traps and the surfaces, yet some conclusions can be drawn; nylon had the lowest CE% for all cases (∼10%), and the stainless steel mesh had the lowest CE% for the evaluated traps (∼20%). Though the testing parameters have been standardized among the participants to establish a framework for an independent comparison of contact sampling media and surfaces, substantial variations in the DTE% and the CE% were observed, suggesting that other variables can affect contact sampling. [Display omitted] • Framework for characterizing contact sampling efficiencies of energetic residues is developed. • Method is evaluated in a round robin study and it shows good reproducibility between the performers. • Swab ability to access surface features and accommodate residue plays a substantial role in the sampling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00399140
Volume :
234
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Talanta
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151734404
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.talanta.2021.122633