Back to Search Start Over

Test–Retest Reliability of the Total Motion Release® Scale.

Authors :
Miley, Emilie N.
Reeves, Ashley J.
Casanova, Madeline P.
Martonick, Nickolai J.P.
Baker, Jayme
Baker, Russell T.
Source :
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation. Aug2021, Vol. 30 Issue 6, p961-964. 4p. 1 Color Photograph, 1 Chart.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Context: Total Motion Release® (TMR®) is a novel treatment paradigm used to restore asymmetries in the body (eg, pain, tightness, limited range of motion). Six primary movements, known as the Fab 6, are performed by the patient and scored using a 0 to 100 scale. Clinicians currently utilize the TMR® scale to modify treatment, assess patient progress, and measure treatment effectiveness; however, the reliability of the TMR® scale has not been determined. It is imperative to assess scale reliability and establish minimal detectable change (MDC) values to guide clinical practice. Objective: To assess the reliability of the TMR® scale and establish MDC values for each motion in healthy individuals in a group setting. Design: Retrospective analysis of group TMR® assessments. Setting: University classroom. Participants: A convenience sample of 61 students (23 males and 38 females; 25.48 [5.73] y), with (n = 31) and without (n = 30) previous exposure to TMR®. Intervention: The TMR® Fab 6 movements were tested at 2 time points, 2 hours apart. A clinician with previous training in TMR® led participant groups through both sessions while participants recorded individual motion scores using the 0 to 100 TMR® scale. Test–retest reliability was calculated using an intraclass correlation coefficient (2,1) for inexperienced, experienced, and combined student groups. Standard error of measurement and MDC values were also assessed for each intraclass correlation coefficient. Outcome Measure: Self-reported scores on the TMR® scale. Results: Test–retest reliability ranged from 0.57 to 0.95 across the Fab 6 movements, standard error of measurement values ranged from 4.85 to 11.77, and MDC values ranged from 13.45 to 32.62. Conclusion: The results indicate moderate to excellent reliability across the Fab 6 movements and a range of MDC values. Although this study is the first step in assessing the reliability of the TMR® scale for clinical practice, caution is warranted until further research is completed to establish reliability and MDC values of the TMR® scale in various settings to better guide patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10566716
Volume :
30
Issue :
6
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Sport Rehabilitation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151627293
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2020-0275