Back to Search Start Over

Long-term Survival after Combined Epidural-General Anesthesia or General Anesthesia Alone: Follow-up of a Randomized Trial.

Authors :
Ya-Ting Du
Ya-Wei Li
Bin-Jiang Zhao
Xiang-Yang Guo
Yi Feng
Ming-Zhang Zuo
Cong Fu
Wei-Jie Zhou
Huai-Jin Li
Ya-Fei Liu
Tong Cheng
Dong-Liang Mu
Yuan Zeng
Peng-Fei Liu
Yan Li
Hai-Yan An
Sai-Nan Zhu
Xue-Ying Li
Hui-Juan Li
Yang-Feng Wu
Source :
Anesthesiology. Aug2021, Vol. 135 Issue 2, p233-245. 13p.
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Experimental and observational research suggests that combined epidural-general anesthesia may improve long-term survival after cancer surgery by reducing anesthetic and opioid consumption and by blunting surgery-related inflammation. This study therefore tested the primary hypothesis that combined epidural-general anesthesia improves long-term survival in elderly patients.<bold>Methods: </bold>This article presents a long-term follow-up of patients enrolled in a previous trial conducted at five hospitals. Patients aged 60 to 90 yr and scheduled for major noncardiac thoracic and abdominal surgeries were randomly assigned to either combined epidural-general anesthesia with postoperative epidural analgesia or general anesthesia alone with postoperative intravenous analgesia. The primary outcome was overall postoperative survival. Secondary outcomes included cancer-specific, recurrence-free, and event-free survival.<bold>Results: </bold>Among 1,802 patients who were enrolled and randomized in the underlying trial, 1,712 were included in the long-term analysis; 92% had surgery for cancer. The median follow-up duration was 66 months (interquartile range, 61 to 80). Among patients assigned to combined epidural-general anesthesia, 355 of 853 (42%) died compared with 326 of 859 (38%) deaths in patients assigned to general anesthesia alone: adjusted hazard ratio, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = 0.408. Cancer-specific survival was similar with combined epidural-general anesthesia (327 of 853 [38%]) and general anesthesia alone (292 of 859 [34%]): adjusted hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.28; P = 0.290. Recurrence-free survival was 401 of 853 [47%] for patients who had combined epidural-general anesthesia versus 389 of 859 [45%] with general anesthesia alone: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.12; P = 0.692. Event-free survival was 466 of 853 [55%] in patients who had combined epidural-general anesthesia versus 450 of 859 [52%] for general anesthesia alone: adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.12; P = 0.815.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In elderly patients having major thoracic and abdominal surgery, combined epidural-general anesthesia with epidural analgesia did not improve overall or cancer-specific long-term mortality. Nor did epidural analgesia improve recurrence-free survival. Either approach can therefore reasonably be selected based on patient and clinician preference.<bold>Editor’s Perspective: </bold> [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00033022
Volume :
135
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Anesthesiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
151616943
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000003835