Farmers' adoption and perceived benefits of diversified crop rotations in the margins of U.S. Corn Belt.

Monoculture and simplified two-crop rotation systems compromise the ecosystem services essential to crop production, diminish agricultural productivity, and cause detrimental effects on the environment. In contrast to the simplified two-crop rotation, diversified crop rotation (DCR) refers to rotation systems that contain three or more crops. Despite multiple benefits generated by DCR, its usage has dwindled over the past several decades. This paper examined determinants of farmers' adoption decisions and perceived benefits of DCR in the west margins of the U.S. Corn Belt where crop diversity has declined. We analyzed 708 farmer responses from a farmer survey conducted in the eastern South Dakota in 2018, accounting for county-level climate variables, as well as cropland data, soil and topographic variables in close proximity of the farm. Our findings indicated that farmers were more likely to utilize DCR as an adaptive strategy to cope with water deficit and reduce soil erosion on marginal land. Additionally, livestock integration and organic farming helped necessitate DCR adoption and magnify its benefits. Producer concerns towards lack of equipment and new crop profitability diluted producers' interests in DCR practice and compromised its benefits. Enhanced technical and policy support, along with infrastructure and market development, could help producers fully utilize DCR benefits and expand DCR usage to more regions. • We examine adoption and perceived benefits of diversified crop rotations (DCR). • Producers use DCR on steeper-sloped lands and in regions with greater water deficit. • Livestock integration and organic farming necessitate DCR and magnify its benefits. • Lack of equipment and profitability diluted producers' interests in DCR practice. • Enhanced technical and policy support are needed to promote DCR in expanded regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]